Theory of the folklore text

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bralina, S.Zh.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-02-03T09:14:13Z
dc.date.available 2017-02-03T09:14:13Z
dc.date.issued 2016-09-30
dc.identifier.citation Bralina S.Zh. Theory of the folklore text/S.Zh. Bralina//Қарағанды универисетінің хабаршысы. Филология Сериясы.=Вестник Карагандинского университета. Серия Филология.= Bulletin of the Karaganda University. Philology Series.-2016.-№3.-P. 52-59.
dc.identifier.issn 0142-0843
dc.identifier.uri http://rep.ksu.kz/handle/data/960
dc.description.abstract In the article the concept of the folklore text is scrutinized. For this purpose textologic, semiotic, functional peculiarities of the folklore text are revealed. History of science makes us see that folklore study for a long time actively has been using the category of text. But the notion itself in the sphere of folklore study gained different interpretations, reaching far beyond the borders of textual study. Evolution of the notion «folklore text», its functional and semantic reevaluation has in the basis common processes of development, existing as in folklore itself, so in the science treating it. Investigation concerning the problem of traditional and modern folklore, its identification features, types and peculiarities of existence is the matter of conceptual importance for this article. Contemporary perception of folklore is a magnificent picture of in many ways different phenomena not confined only to cultural ones. From nominative and semantic point of view this situation is determined by different factors of ethnical, historical, scientific and educational nature. All this enables us to speak about such types of folklore as written folklore, postfolklore, antifolklore, folklore routine, verbal and non-verbal, spoken and oral culture, folklore subcultures, artistic communication within the limits of folkgroups, Netlore (folklore of Internet) etc. Special attention is paid to contemporary conceptions of folklore text. All the conceptions mentioned above, as diversified as they can be, still have something common in several positions. First of all, they state that folklore text is different from literary one. Hence takes its origin common tendency among researchers to widen borders of text space in folklore and treat it with taking into consideration facts, analyzed by other humanitarian sciences. ru_RU
dc.language.iso en ru_RU
dc.publisher KSU publ. ru_RU
dc.relation.ispartofseries Қарағанды универисетінің хабаршысы. Филология Сериясы.=Вестник Карагандинского университета. Серия Филология.= Bulletin of the Karaganda University. Philology Series; № 3(83)/2016
dc.subject folklore ru_RU
dc.subject postfolklore ru_RU
dc.subject folklore text ru_RU
dc.subject folklore textual study ru_RU
dc.subject folklore tradition ru_RU
dc.subject variant of the folklore text ru_RU
dc.subject semiotic text ru_RU
dc.subject verbal culture ru_RU
dc.subject linguistic folklore study ru_RU
dc.subject ethnolinguistics ru_RU
dc.title Theory of the folklore text ru_RU
dc.title.alternative Фольклор мəтінінің теориясы
dc.title.alternative Теория фольклорного текста
dc.type Article ru_RU


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account